No Government, No Force


The word Anarchy, from the Greeks, was (and remains) No Ruler, from which No Government logically follows.

That definition does NOT include “lawlessness, chaos, disorder, criminality, and an absence of institutions”. Such are merely theoretical Effects, not the definition, of the word Anarchy. Since few if any human beings have experienced anything other than  being Ruled, the Effects of anarchy are unknown and thus proven,

Despite that truth, yes we see those assumed Effects are now part of the supposed definition at most any dictionary we search. So we corrupt the language to meaningless, as in “what is a liberal, or ‘progressive’ and even right/left, conservative/liberal, and today they’re trying to get rid of male/female.

There is no essential difference between being Governed and being Ruled. Both are accomplished via Force, the key component of every GOVERNment. Both are beyond control of the people for that single reason. People, regular humans, chose others to Rule or Govern them. Once established, a government becomes autonomous, and run by who? Ah, just other humans, but always those of a controlling and dominating nature.

Never is a government established with the consent of all people, but once established all people who arrive afterward are forced to conform to whatever that government decrees, DESPITE that never-after is anyone given any right to consent, nor to refuse to conform. Those who are placed in a position of power to rule do exactly that; they Rule. It never becomes less, rather it always becomes more, and hence all governments and Rulers are certain to become both oppressive and tyrannical. That government finally fails, and is customarily replaced, perhaps after some period of having no government,

It may be possible to create a government in which all matters are Voluntary, IOW only with the consent of each individual, but that remains to be seen. The only way that seems possible is prohibiting government from having any powers of force whatsoever against it’s “citizens”. The entire nature of this world would change immensely. The People, meaning each individual, would be the better for it. Do they really have the intelligence to insist on pure Liberty? We are about to find out.

Our Voluntary Flag

Sorry, but this country is not “GOING to change forever”, it already HAS! ZeroCare was the last straw, and massive resistance should have begun the minute it was signed, but NO!

Obama’s “vision” won the voting in ’08, yet Rush says “nowhere near a majority”? Ha! A few of those sheeple have left the fold, but vote2012 will cure nothing, no matter who wins we can expect nothing but “more of the same”. This train into the abyss has no brakes.

America, and indeed this entire planet, has been on the path to self-destruction for a century, and the so-called “intelligent” humans have OPTED to be Ruled by… whom? Other HUMANS, exactly like themselves, except that Never will the Rulers admit or even mention that they – those who come to be Rulers – have the dominant gene of Force. Those become Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Marx, Lenin, Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Wilson, Roosevelt’s, Bush’s, Keynes or Obama’s of this world, and that’s the short-list.

All create, use, or manipulate GOVERNments to Force their dastardly deeds upon the People. In earlier times such were called empires, land barons and kings, but by whatever name all are the same. It’s always the Force of one with the unthinking subservience of all others.


share save 120 16 Anarchy
Updated: 06 Oct 2016 — 18:58:48


Add a Comment
  1. Vernor Vinge has some nice stories about an anarcho-capitalist society arising after a bio war:

    The Ungoverned, The Peace War, and so on.

    Also, he has a nice story about a bunch of interstellar free-traders going up against a brutal communist regime:

    “A Deepness in the Sky”

    1. Do any of these (I assume you to mean he has books out) approach a possible reality, or they just entertainment or pie-in-the-sky?

    2. You are welcome to include links on No-Ruler, unless, that is, one is trying to redirect to nonsense!

  2. I don’t see us getting to 2016 with the present system, which means that anarchy will be the norm on this planet when we hit the abyss. Won’t be fun, not at all, but from that dilemma there’s nothing to stop the survivors from looking back and saying “never again”. Seems most people, tho, after enduring 3 millennia of government rule by force cannot conceive of living without government. Most certainly the leftist proponents of Force MUST have a government to enforce their agenda upon the world.

    1. It has always been difficult for me to imagine living without at least a system of law and order. One would always, and I mean always live on guard, for bad people are always in any population. However, I am so desperately hating some of what I am witnessing happening now, that lately I have thought I might actually prefer having no government!

      1. I finally wrote this because I got dang sick and tired of the many who misrepresent Anarchy by adding speculative “effects” to the definition. Since mankind has been ruled and then governed since the beginnings of history (and surely even before) the existence of those “effects” can be only opinion, not logic and not truth.

        Myself, not always an anarchist, but adopted this after a lifetime of the endless and eternal Force used by Rulers against the general populace. Isn’t something very wrong with that picture?

Leave a Reply © 2017 Sharing and Reposting are welcome; we expect due credit to Author and Frontier Theme