No Government, No Force


IMF Governance

This article is a compilation of information from the IMF website. I would appreciate all input anyone has relating to the use of American taxpayers’ dollars that ago to the IMF, particularly when the US is essentially bankrupt. Many such articles could be written on each and everything mentioned.

I am personally opposed to remaining a member of the IMF. Its idea may have been compassionate in the beginning, but at this point I do not see how we can continue taxing people to pay for other nations’ inabilities to care for themselves. However, I will be happy to see counter-arguments as well.


The IMF, also known as the “Fund,” was conceived at a United Nations conference convened in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, United States, in July 1944. The 44 governments represented at that conference sought to build a framework for economic cooperation that would avoid a repetition of the vicious circle of competitive devaluations that had contributed to the Great Depression of the 1930s.

The IMF’s primary purpose is to ensure the stability of the international monetary system—the system of exchange rates and international payments that enables countries (and their citizens) to transact with one other. This system is essential for promoting sustainable economic growth, increasing living standards, and reducing poverty.

Fast Facts on the IMF

Membership: 187 countries

Headquarters: Washington, D.C.

Executive Board: 24 Directors representing countries or groups of countries

Staff: Approximately 2,500 from 160 countries

Total quotas: US$340 billion (as of 1/31/11)

Additional pledged or committed resources: US$600 billion

Loans committed (as of 1/31/11): US$254 billion, of which US$190 billion have not been drawn (see table)

Biggest borrowers (credit outstanding as of 1/31/11): Romania, Ukraine, Greece

Surveillance consultations: Consultations concluded for 120 countries in FY2010 and for 88 countries in FY2011 as of 02/11/11

Technical assistance: Field delivery in FY2010—192.5 person years

Transparency: In 2009, over 90 percent of Article IV and program-related staff reports and policy papers were published

Original aims: Article I of the Articles of Agreement sets out the IMF’s main goals:

promoting international monetary cooperation;

facilitating the expansion and balanced growth of international trade;

promoting exchange stability;

assisting in the establishment of a multilateral system of payments; and

making resources available (with adequate safeguards) to members experiencing balance of payments difficulties


Resources: The IMF’s resources are provided by its member countries, primarily through payment of quotas, which broadly reflect each country’s economic size. At the April 2009 G-20 Summit, world leaders pledged to support a tripling of the IMF’s lending resources from about US$250 billion to US$750 billion. To deliver on this pledge, the current and new participants in the New Arrangements to Borrow (NAB) agreed to expand the NAB to about US$550 billion, which was approved by the Executive Board of the IMF on April 12, 2010. When concluding the 14th General Review of Quotas in December 2010, Governors agreed to double the IMF’s quota resources to approximately US$745 billion and a major realignment of quota shares among members. When the quota increase becomes effective, there will be a corresponding rollback in NAB resources.

How countries are represented is key to the IMF’s legitimacy as an international organization representing the interests of its 187 member countries. Upon joining the IMF, each country is allocated a quota based approximately on the relative size of its economy. The quota determines the country’s financial contribution to the IMF, its voting power, and ability to access IMF financing.


The IMF’s Role in Helping Protect the Most Vulnerable in the Global Crisis

March 31, 2011

In this difficult environment, the IMF is helping governments to protect and even increase social spending, including social assistance. In particular, the IMF is promoting measures to increase spending on, and improve the targeting of, social safety net programs that can mitigate the impact of the crisis on the most vulnerable in society. Below are some examples of how recent IMF-supported programs seek to protect social spending in a way that is both fiscally sustainable and cost-effective.


To Help Countries Face Crisis, IMF Revamps its Lending

March 24, 2009

IMF announces major overhaul of its lending and conditionality framework

Includes new credit lines for strong-performing economies that need insurance

Revamp complements IMF moves to sharply boost lending capacity


Working to reduce poverty

The IMF is working to prevent millions of people in low-income countries from slipping into poverty as the third wave of the global economic crisis washes up on their shores.

Low-income countries, which are still feeling the effects of the recent food and fuel crisis, have sought the IMF’s help in coping with the effects of the global financial crisis. Although advanced and emerging economies were hit first, low-income countries are now experiencing sharply lower exports, shrinking foreign direct investment, and declining remittances as a result of the global downturn.

Besides providing new concessional financing, policy advice, and technical assistance, the IMF is taking measures to help low-income countries protect spending on health, education, and other critical services.



  1. The IMF is just another political entity out to steal even more money. Screw them and all who think they are something good. Nothing good comes from any form of governmemnt in this world. Things need changed, at the right time.

    1. You got THAT right! There IS some good news, tho. I expect that collapse will wipe out the IMF and the UN along with all the rest of the governments on this planet earth – why? They all issue fiat money. The US claims to be holding some gold in Fort Knox. Also we’ve seen reports of China dumping US T-debt and buying gold, 200 tons a couple of months ago, and now planning to buy another $trillion in gold, that being about equal to China’s reported current holdings of T-debt.

      Collapse may very well be humanity’s last real opportunity to ditch Govern for Voluntary. I shudder to think that more and more people are talking revolution. What can revolution accomplish while no common objective exists? Lots of blood will leave a melluvahess!

Comments are closed. © 2017 Sharing and Reposting are welcome; we expect due credit to Author and Frontier Theme