No Government, No Force

2nd Hypothesis

I received this as a major part of an email from “Soldier”, or perhaps Ed Johnson  had sent that part.  In either case but the original author wasn’t shown.  I did search for that but found nothing definitive.  If anyone knows more of the source, please relay something!  So the whole thing is somewhat confusing, while certainly making very definite and clearly sourced points.

It is the duty of every lawful American Citizen to oppose all enemies of this Nation, foreign and DOMESTIC. (Note added: Every Lawful and recognized American Citizen including all Elected, Appointed, hired public servant(s), (Children’s Protection Services, Police, Sheriff’s, Martials, CIA, FBI, Capital Police, Secret Service, City Council, County Commissioners, Board of Commissioners,et al, Religious Organizations, Associations, Schools, Colleges, Universities, Schools of Law, Corporations, LLC’s, Doctors, Nurses, Health Care Providers, Unions, et al,) to [perform their] Oath of Office, in compliance to the 1776 Constitution for the United States of America, to all matters herein related thereof. Please help pass this information to other professionals in your area – and honor thy 1776 Constitutional oath of office in your area of expertise it is after all as Lawful Americans’ right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness that ‘GOD’ promised mine and your bloodline of this United States of America for all mankind thereof.  Please read read title 18 all of it’ ‘The Original Thirteenth Article of Amendment To The Constitution For The United States

“If any citizen of the United States shall accept, claim, receive, or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office, or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince, or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” [Journal of the Senate]

Citizens (Federal) and Persons vs. People

CITIZENS. Citizens are members of a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the protection of their individual as well as collective rights.—U.S. v Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542—

If one is established as a “people”, individually or collectively, then one is entitled to all the rights, which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89 10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228; 37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 167; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.

A people may do anything he or she wishes to do so long as it does not damage, injure, or impair the same Right or property of another individual. 10 Pick. 9; United States Exp. Co. v. Henderson, 69 Iowa, 40, 28 N. W. 426; Greenl. Ev. 469a quoted in Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906). A people owes no duty to the state or the public as long as he does not trespass.

Lansing v. Smith 21 D. 89. people of a state are entitled to all rights which formerly belonged to the king by his prerogative……….2. Citizens – United States citizenship does not entitle citizen to rights and privileges of state citizenship. Citizenship of the United States does not entitle citizen to privileges and immunities of citizen of the state,since privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other. Tashiro v. Jordan S.F.1234G. S.C.C. 5-20-1927

“Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state.” Crosse v. Board of Supervisors of Elections (1966) 221 A.2d 431 p.4

“The Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, ratified[1] in 1868, CREATES or at least recognizes for THE FIRST TIME a [federal] citizenship of the United States, AS DISTINCT FROM THAT OF THE STATES…”  Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition

[1] This is a BOLD LIE, it was never ratified per Article V of the U.S. Constitution (Congressional Record House, June 13, 1967, pg 15641-15646 and Dyett v Turner (1968) are VERY CLEAR about this)


Red lights flashing behind you. When a cop turns on ‘emergency’ lights to stop someone and asks for license and REGIS tration, and then writes a summons-ticket, executes it and demands one’s bond in the form of an agreement to appear, and then
serves the summons, the cop is breaking the laws:

1) The turning on of lights means an ‘emergency’ is in effect. The cop wants people to think he is stopping traffic and that the one being stopped is the ‘emergency.’ Where was the emergency? Nowhere, of course. The cop just wanted to perform a “traffic stop.” By doing so, the cop perpetuated several fraudulent actions. a) The cop deceived the one being stopped into thinking there was an emergency. b) Impersonated a government official on emergency business. The cop in reality is a Corpora Ficta employee and not a government employee. He has no authority of a government official at all. There are TWO lawfully excusable conditions for seizing property or People: 1) A warrant of the law. 2) First-hand observation of a crime being committed. This is not just the law. This is constitutionally mandated. The cop needs the DRIVERS License and REGIS tration as prima facie evidence to support the claim of trafficking instead of traveling, if indeed one is not transporting people or property for hire or profit.

2) Cops are only authorized to enforce statute and ordinance, not LAW. Statutes are passed by STATE of Corpora Fictas. Ordinances are passed by City/County of Corpora Fictas. LAW is only the Natural Law, Common Law. DMV is only a corporate Dept. in State of oregon , Ohio ,CA. Corpora Ficta. License and REGIS tration are commercial agreements and not contracts. IFF one of us is not involved in commercial activity then there is no exercise of a privilege that must be licensed and REGIS tered. Licenses and REGIS trations are ONLY required for commercial activity; that means business ONLY. In LAW, people have the right to travel as a part of one’s right to liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

3) IFF the cop perceives that one of us may have broken the law or actually infracted a statute and writes a ticket with a summons, the cop is now impersonating an officer of the court, which the cop is clearly not. The cop is thereby impersonating a Judicial Officer. Who in all of America can write a summons to a court unless they are actually authorized to serve in a judicial capacity? Answer: No one else may.

“If money is wanted by rulers who have in any manner oppressed the People, they may retain it until their grievances are redressed, and thus peaceably procure relief, without trusting to despised petitions or disturbing the public tranquility.” Journals of the Continental Congress. 26 October, 1774©1789. Journals 1: 105©13.


Subject: 1933 Bankruptcy was a staged event = fraud by trickery, collusion, R.I.C.O.

Proof the 1933 Bankruptcy was a staged event as the international bankers met at Basel.

…whereas such agreements entailed the surrender of rights of the United States and whereas the said agreement so made have never been disclosed or submitted to the Congress of the United States for ratification and have never become law in the United States: and whereas a second conference, composed of a committee appointed by direction of the aforesaid London Conference under stipulation it should consist of representatives nominated by the governors of the central bank interested and that it was to take place at Basel under the Bank of International Settlements; and whereas Albert H. Wiggin appeared at the said conference at Basel as the representative of the United States on the nomination of Gerorge L Harrison, of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York an individual who had no power to make the said nomination and whereas control of all the banking system of the United States including the fiscal agents of the United States Government with their control of United States Treasury funds was given to this London Conference committee , consisting of Albert H. Wiggin, Alberto Beneduce, Dr. R. G. Bindschedler, E. Fringul, P. Hofste de de Groot, Walter T. Layton, C. Melchoir, E. Moreau, O Rybeck, T. Tanka, upon which the so-called United States representative was out numbered nine to one by the control of all banking system and all the wealth of the United States and control of the Untied States Treasury was thus given to foreign powers;; and whereas actions taken by the said committee made it impossible for the banks of the United States to withdraw the funds of their depositors and other funds from Germany and obliged the banks of the United States continually to maintain the volume of their funds in Germany and made it impossible for the Treasury of the United States to withdraw moneys unlawfully taken from it and placed in Germany; and whereas such actions in regard to the banks and banking system of the United States were unlawful and where unnecessary for any benefit to Germany, whose economic and budgetary situation according to the report of the London conference did not justify a lack of confidence; and whereas the said actions were taken as measures of deflation against the American people to impound United States funds in Germany under foreign control, to paralize United States Banks, to injure the United States Treasury, and to keep the United States in a condition of depression until misery and fear and starvation would drive the people of the United States into submission and compel them to cancel the war debt owed to them; and whereas the said Wiggin had no lawful power to represent the baning system of the United States at the said conference at Basel; and whereas the nomination of the said Wiggin by an indiviual at the direction of the ministters of Great Britian, France, Germany, Belgium, Itally, Japan and the United States was unlawful; and whereas the agreements made and the action taken by the London Conference committe at Basel have never been submitted tot he Congress of the United States; and whereas billions of dollars in bank deposits have been lost by American citizens on account of the said agreements, and many United States banks have failed by reason of them and the Reconstruction jFinance Corporation has made loans of public money to banks and institutions injured by them and the public debt of the Untied States and the deficit in the United States Treasury have been increased by the actions of the London Conference committee at BAsel; and whereas the said actions were taken on the intiative and by the direction of the said Hoover; and whereas the still-holding agreements entered into at Basel by the said Wiggin was unlawful and was prepared concurren with the terms of the Hoover moratorium proposal by the said Hoover and others and was presented to the London conference by Henry L. Stimsipation as a joint product of British and American partticipation and was a part of a conspiracy designed to force the United States into submission to foreign nations and international bankers and thus to obtain cancellation of the war debts; and whereas in violation of the Constitution and laws of the United States, Herbert Hoover, President of the United States, initiated the London Conference and the Prearranged events which flowed from it; and whereas the London Conference was deceitfullytly initiated by the said Hoover for the purpose of securing cancellation of the war debts as shown by facts and circumstances; and whereas the Herold Tribune published a report at the close of the London Conference, a part of which reads as follows:
“If, as these British leaders expect, the committee recommends a considerable extension of credits to Germany ; if it indicates, further, that permanent amelioration of that situation depends upon reconsideration of the war debts and reparations problem, and if the interested powers take action along these lines the British admit that something indeed will have been accomplished-”

The record continues to include the impeachment of President Hoover for violations to the Constitution and laws of the United States, conducting conversations ignominious to the United States, attempting to negotiate treaties and agreements ignominious to the United States for the benefit of foreign nations and individuals, which violations make him guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors subject to impeachment;… it continues.

???? Key logger hacker – These are your documents written by the Congress in session – not my problem dude nor yours. Whereas you and you alone do not want this exposed you then become a part of the fraud scheme and liable for you actions thereof. Buzz off – understood? The crimes Honest service fraud, aiding and abetting in the theft of the United States Treasury – are but 2 and I can think of a great deal more aka TREASON

share save 120 16 2nd Hypothesis
Share © 2017 Sharing and Reposting are welcome; we expect due credit to Author and Frontier Theme